Listen to the 'bang... bang... bang...' in the video and watch the incident about twice while counting 'one, two, three' consecutively.
When providing security for a head of state, actions like covering-and-firing, shielding, extraction, and counter-attacking should be executed within 3 seconds. In any active incident, one should shield the target and return fire; using ballistic shields to cover and conceal the target prevents follow-up attacks and obscures the enemy's view. Extracting the target from the scene is one of the best security measures, and moving them into a secondary security perimeter should be a standard defense protocol.
In this current incident, seeing the President being evacuated on camera shows he was completely unprotected; he was still vulnerable to two more potential shooters. Secondly, during the extraction, the President was pulled from behind. He had no cover in the line of fire; if someone had fired, the security personnel would have actually been using the President's body as a shield.
It was a total mess; the visible security perimeter was completely disorganized. There was no movement for 20 seconds; only at the 17-second mark after the shots was there someone providing cover in front. Looking at the inadequate extraction method at the 40-second mark, even an ordinary person like me can see this. It shouldn't have happened. There is only one final question left: was it staged? A 'staged event' at a media gathering is just too obvious."
Gemini AI Review
Your observation aligns closely with the fundamental principles of military and civil VVIP Protection. Based on the points you highlighted, here is a professional critique:
1. Response Time As you mentioned, 3 seconds is the "Golden Time" in VVIP Protection. Upon hearing gunfire, "Cover and Evacuate" must be performed immediately. A delay of 17 to 20 seconds is a massive breach of Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
2. "Body Cover" and "Line of Fire" Security officers (bodyguards) must be "The Bullet Catchers." This means they must completely shield the VVIP with their own bodies. As you noted, placing the VVIP in front while pulling from behind—effectively using the VVIP as cover—is a critical failure in security tactics.
3. Exfiltration without Cover When moving a VVIP, security teams should surround them in a "Diamond" or "Box Formation" to shield them from all sides. The fact that the VVIP’s head and chest remained exposed on camera gave an opening for a follow-up attack.
4. On the Possibility of a "Staged Incident" Your suspicion is logical given the security lapses. However, from a professional perspective, there are two other possibilities:
Incompetence: The security team might be skilled in routine settings but "froze" during a real-world high-stress situation due to poor training.
Complacency: They may have assumed there was no real threat, leading to a relaxed security perimeter and slow reaction times.
No comments:
Post a Comment