Executive Summary
This report analyzes the dynamics of China's exports to the United States over the past 5-15 years, focusing on identifying high-volume product categories, assessing the profitability of Chinese manufacturers within these sectors, examining value distribution along the supply chain, and investigating claims of exceptionally high profit margins.
The analysis confirms the continued dominance of Electrical Machinery and Equipment (HS 85) and Machinery, including Computers (HS 84) as the top China-to-US export categories by value, representing a significant portion of bilateral trade despite recent diversification efforts and trade tensions. While overall volume data is less standardized, these categories, along with apparel, furniture, and toys, represent substantial physical flows.
Profitability for Chinese manufacturers, particularly those engaged in Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM), remains generally low. Average net profit margins often hover in the low single digits (e.g., 2-7%) across key sectors like electronics components, apparel, and footwear, squeezed by intense competition and rising costs. Exceptions exist for companies that have successfully built brands (e.g., Midea, Haier in appliances, achieving margins potentially in the 6-9% range) or specialized in high-value niches (e.g., Shenzhou International in apparel).
A significant portion of the final retail value of goods imported from China is captured downstream by US entities. Branding, marketing, intellectual property, logistics, distribution, and retail operations account for substantial markups over the initial factory gate price. Claims of extreme markups (e.g., "20 times" or higher) typically refer to the difference between the factory cost and the final US retail price, particularly for luxury goods or items with very low production costs and high brand value. These markups reflect the cumulative costs and profits across the entire supply chain, not the profit margin realized by the Chinese manufacturer, which remains comparatively small.
Synthesizing volume and profitability, the categories offering the best combination of high export volume and relatively stronger profit margins for Chinese entities appear to be branded consumer electronics and appliances, specialized industrial machinery and components (potentially including EV-related parts), and potentially niche, high-value-added textiles or apparel. Success in achieving higher margins necessitates a strategic shift for Chinese firms beyond low-cost manufacturing towards innovation, branding (OBM/ODM), and capturing greater value within the global supply chain. Geopolitical factors and trade policies, particularly tariffs, continue to exert significant pressure on costs and sourcing strategies, impacting profit distribution throughout the chain.
I. China-US Export Landscape (Past 5-15 Years)
A. Overview of Bilateral Trade Trends
The trade relationship between China and the United States has been characterized by enormous growth, particularly following China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001.1 For decades, China served as a primary source of lower-cost consumer goods and intermediate inputs for the US market, while the US became China's top export destination.1 This dynamic fueled higher profits for many US corporations and lower prices for US consumers.1 China rapidly ascended trade rankings, becoming the world's third-largest exporter by 2004 3 and eventually the largest in many advanced industries by 2020.4 In 2022, the US and China combined accounted for 43% of global GDP and nearly 48% of global manufacturing output.1
However, the past 5-10 years have witnessed significant shifts and increased volatility. Trade tensions escalated markedly starting in 2018, leading to the imposition of substantial tariffs by both countries.1 These tariffs, coupled with pandemic-related disruptions and broader geopolitical concerns about supply chain resilience, have prompted efforts by US companies and policymakers to diversify sourcing away from China, often termed "de-risking" or "nearshoring/friendshoring".6
Consequently, China's share of total US goods imports has declined from its peak. After reaching 21.6% in 2017, it fell to 16.5% in 2022 6 and approximately 13.5% in 2024, trailing Mexico.1 Total bilateral goods trade decreased significantly in 2023 (down 17% from 2022) due to China's economic slowdown and these ongoing supply chain shifts.2 While US imports from China saw a partial rebound in 2024 (up 2.8% from 2023), US exports to China continued to decline (down 2.9%).15 As of 2024, China ranked as the US's fourth-largest goods trading partner overall, the fourth-largest export market, and the third-largest source of imports.16 This contrasts with 2021, when China was the third-largest partner but the top source of imports.17 Despite these shifts, the US remains a critical export market for China, and China remains a major supplier to the US, particularly for specific categories of goods.1
Interpreting bilateral trade data requires acknowledging inherent discrepancies between reporting countries ("mirror data").18 Differences in valuation methods (e.g., US imports often reported Cost, Insurance, and Freight - CIF; exports reported Free on Board - FOB), the inclusion of transit costs and insurance in import values, and the role of re-export hubs like Hong Kong can lead to variations in reported figures.18 For instance, Chinese goods transshipped via Hong Kong might be recorded as exports to Hong Kong by China but imports from China by the US.18 Historically, US-reported deficits with China were higher than China-reported surpluses, but this trend has reversed since 2019, potentially influenced by tariff impacts and reporting adjustments.18 Key sources for tracking this trade include the US Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the US International Trade Commission (USITC), the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), and the UN Comtrade database.1
B. Top Export Categories by Value (Focus: Electronics, Machinery, Apparel, Furniture, Toys)
Analysis of trade data consistently reveals the dominance of manufactured goods, particularly electronics and machinery, in China's exports to the US by value over the past 5-15 years.
Based on data from 2023 and surrounding years, the leading categories are:
Electrical Machinery and Equipment (HS Chapter 85): This category consistently ranks first, valued at approximately $124.5 billion in 2023.39 It encompasses a wide range of products, including telephones (smartphones), computers and peripherals, broadcasting equipment, integrated circuits, consumer electronics (TVs, audio), and batteries.25 In 2024, US imports of electrical machinery and equipment from China accounted for 28.2% of total US imports from China.52 Specific high-value items include broadcasting equipment ($54.5B in 2023) 51 and smartphones ($41.7B in 2024, representing 81% of total US smartphone imports).52 This sector represented 47.7% of US imports from China in 2021 17 and 48.1% in 2019.22
Machinery, Nuclear Reactors, Boilers (including Computers) (HS Chapter 84): This category ranks second, with exports valued at approximately $89 billion in 2023.39 Key products include computers and parts, industrial machinery, and household appliances.25 In 2024, this category accounted for 18.7% of US imports from China.52 Computers specifically accounted for $36.7B of US imports from China in 2024 (26% of total US computer imports).52 This sector represented 23.9% of US exports to China in 2021 17 and 25.5% in 2019 22, but a much larger share (combining HS84 & 85) of imports from China.
Furniture; Bedding, Mattresses, etc. (HS Chapter 94): Valued at approximately $30.7 billion in 2023.39 This includes various types of home and office furniture.25 It represented 12.3% of US imports from China in 2019 22 and 13.5% in 2021.17
Toys, Games, and Sports Requisites (HS Chapter 95): Exports valued at approximately $29.4 billion in 2023.39 China dominates the US toy market, supplying roughly 77% of total US toy imports.59 This category, combined with furniture/bedding (HS 94) and other miscellaneous items (HS 96), accounted for 12.3% of US imports from China in 2019 22 and 13.5% in 2021.17
Plastics and Articles Thereof (HS Chapter 39): Valued at approximately $23.3 billion in 2023.39 This category includes a wide range of plastic products from household items to industrial components.52
Apparel and Clothing Accessories (Knitted or Crocheted, HS Chapter 61 & Not Knitted or Crocheted, HS Chapter 62): Combined value of approximately $31.8 billion in 2023 ($18.9B knit + $12.9B non-knit).39 China remains a leading global exporter of apparel and textiles, although its share in the US market has faced pressure.60 In 2021, the US imported $50.3 billion worth of textile products (a broader category including apparel) from China, representing 32.6% of total US textile imports.17 In 2019, textiles and footwear combined accounted for 12.1% of US imports from China.22
These top categories reflect China's established manufacturing prowess but also highlight a significant shift over the past 15 years. Early in the 2000s, textiles, apparel, footwear, and toys were more dominant, but there has been a notable move into higher-technology sectors like office machines, electrical machinery, and telecommunications equipment.3 This increasing sophistication of China's export basket is a key trend.3
C. Top Export Categories by Volume (Where Available)
While value data is more consistently reported, volume metrics (units, weight) provide another perspective on the scale of trade, particularly for lower-cost, high-quantity items.
Electronics: The sheer value of exports implies massive unit volumes. Global export figures from China in 2023 included 814 million mobile phones, 143 million laptops, and 2.98 trillion integrated circuits.67 While not solely destined for the US, these numbers indicate the scale of production relevant to US imports.
Apparel, Textiles, and Footwear: These categories, despite facing margin pressures and diversification efforts, still represent significant volume due to their nature as consumer staples and China's continued role as a major producer.17 The combined value ($31.8B in 2023) suggests large quantities.
Toys: Similar to apparel, the high market share (~77% of US imports) and substantial value ($29.4B in 2023) point to very high unit volumes being shipped.39
Furniture: The nature of furniture often requires significant shipping volume. Discussions around container shipping (FCL/LCL) specific to furniture imports underscore the bulk involved.68
D. Key Considerations in the Export Landscape
Two crucial factors emerge from analyzing the China-US export landscape. Firstly, despite a decrease in China's overall percentage share of US imports due to tariff impacts and supply chain diversification efforts, its dominance in the highest-value and highest-volume categories, particularly electronics and machinery, persists.17 This dominance, however, appears increasingly concentrated in specific sub-sectors (like smartphones, laptops, specific machinery types) rather than being broadly diversified across all manufactured goods.3 This concentration implies that while the overall reliance might seem to lessen statistically, the dependence on China for specific critical goods remains profound, making these particular trade flows central to the bilateral economic relationship and potentially more sensitive to targeted trade actions.
Secondly, the interpretation of trade data requires caution due to methodological differences and potential biases.18 Discrepancies between US and Chinese reporting ("mirror data"), variations in valuation (CIF vs. FOB), the handling of re-exports through hubs like Hong Kong, and the potential for underreporting by importers seeking to mitigate tariff impacts mean that published figures are best understood as strong indicators of trends and magnitudes rather than precise, absolute values.18 Any analysis, therefore, must acknowledge this inherent variability and focus on consistent patterns observed across different data sources and time periods.
Table 1: Top 10 China-to-US Export Categories (HS 2-Digit) by Average Annual Value (Approx. 2018-2023/24)
*Note: Values are approximate ranges based on synthesizing data from recent years (primarily 2019-2024) across various sources.15 Annual figures fluctuate due to economic conditions and trade policies. HS Chapters 61 & 62 (Apparel) are often analyzed together.
II. Profitability Analysis of Chinese Exporters
A. Overview of Average Profit Margins in Chinese Manufacturing
Despite China's position as a global manufacturing powerhouse, the average profit margins for its manufacturers, particularly those engaged in export-oriented production, are generally understood to be modest. Several analyses suggest that Chinese manufacturers often operate with net profit margins averaging around 3%, particularly in highly commoditized product categories where price competition is fierce.70 The overall manufacturing sector's profit ratio from sales revenue (a measure related to profitability) averaged approximately 5.6% between 2014 and 2018, peaking near 6.35% in late 2017 before showing some volatility.71
Profitability, however, is not uniform and varies considerably depending on several factors. Ownership structure plays a role; historically, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) exhibited lower profitability and efficiency compared to private or foreign-invested firms, partly attributed to factors like preferential access to "soft loans" which may reduce incentives for capital efficiency.72 Foreign-Invested Enterprises (FIEs), especially Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOEs) originating from OECD countries, are significantly involved in China's export sector, particularly in higher-technology goods, and are linked to higher levels of export sophistication, which may correlate with different margin structures.73 The specific position within the value chain is also critical; manufacturers engaged primarily in assembly or processing imported components typically capture less value added compared to firms involved in design, branding, or the production of critical components.66 Recent aggregate data indicates some recovery in overall industrial profits in China (e.g., a rebound in Q1 2025 after a contraction in 2024), but performance varies significantly by specific industry.77
B. Profitability Benchmarks in Key Export Sectors
Examining the major export sectors reveals distinct profitability profiles:
Electronics: This sector, particularly component manufacturing and large-scale contract assembly, is characterized by thin margins. Industry estimates place typical margins between 4-7%.78 More specific analysis of Electronic Component Manufacturing suggests profitability around 2.5% of revenue in 2023, facing pressure from rising costs and competition, though margins are somewhat supported by a shift towards higher-end products.79 Recent data showed profits in the broader Computer and Communications equipment sector growing 3.2% year-over-year in early 2025, indicating some positive momentum.77
Case Study: Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn): As the world's largest contract electronics manufacturer and a key assembler for brands like Apple, Foxconn exemplifies the low-margin, high-volume model. Its gross profit margin has averaged around 6.1% in recent years (2020-2024), peaking at 6.3%.81 Operating margins are even tighter, typically ranging from 2.8% to 3.1%.82 Net profit margins derived from financial reports suggest levels around 2.2-2.3%.84 These figures underscore the limited profitability inherent in large-scale electronics assembly.
Machinery (including Appliances): Profitability data for the overall machinery sector is less granular in the provided sources. However, the Electrical Machinery sub-sector saw profits rise 7.5% year-over-year in early 2025.77 Case studies of major Chinese appliance/machinery brands suggest potential for healthier margins compared to basic component or contract manufacturers.
Case Study: Midea Group: A global brand with significant appliance and industrial technology segments, Midea has shown strong performance. Its gross profit margin improved from the 23-25% range (2020-2022) to 26.5% in 2023.86 Net profit attributable to shareholders was RMB 33.7 billion on RMB 373.7 billion revenue in 2023, implying a net margin around 9.0%.87 Notably, Midea reported slightly higher gross margins for its overseas business (27.16%) compared to its domestic business (26.04%) in 2023.88 This indicates that established brands with global reach and diverse portfolios can achieve significantly better margins.
Case Study: Haier Group: Another major global appliance manufacturer, Haier also demonstrates robust performance, with global revenue of RMB 261.4 billion and net profit growth in 2023.89 Its net profit margin was approximately 6.4% in 2023 (RMB 16.6B profit on RMB 261.4B revenue).89 Haier has focused on quality growth and digitalization, improving profitability despite market challenges.90 Its overseas operating profit saw substantial growth in previous years.92 (Note: IBISWorld data on Haier's US operations shows an 8.7% profit margin for Major Household Appliance Manufacturing in the US 93, but this reflects US operations, not necessarily the margin on exports from China).
Apparel/Textiles/Footwear: This sector generally operates on lower margins compared to higher-tech industries. Historical data from 2018 placed the average gross margin for China's garment/textile industry at 15.1% and the net margin at 5.89%.94 More recent estimates suggest an apparel manufacturing profit margin of around 5.3% of revenue in 2024.95 Profit trends have been mixed recently: textile profits rose 7.1% YoY in Jan-Feb 2025, while garment/accessories profits fell 5.7% and leather/footwear profits dropped 9.5%.77 Footwear manufacturing margins specifically have reportedly decreased over the past five years due to intense competition and rising operating costs.97 Historical data (2012-2015) shows the garment & apparel profit-to-cost ratio averaging 5.835%, peaking around 7%.98
Case Study: Shenzhou International: This company stands out as an exception, reporting exceptionally high margins (31.6% gross, 21.4% net in 2018), far exceeding the industry average.94 This highlights the potential for significantly higher profitability for manufacturers specializing in higher-value segments, potentially involving advanced materials, complex manufacturing processes, or strong relationships with premium brands.
Furniture: The Chinese furniture industry has faced declining profitability in recent years.99 Despite growth in scale, profit growth rates have decreased, with significant drops reported in 2017 (profit growth down 27%).99 This is attributed to factors like insufficient market demand and, critically, rising raw material costs (especially timber).100 Historical data (1999-2014) shows the profit-to-cost ratio peaking around 7-7.4% but averaging closer to 5%.101 Current margins are likely under pressure.
Toys: Specific current profit margins for Chinese toy manufacturers are not explicitly stated, but reports indicate pressure from increased production costs.102 Historical data (2006-2015) shows a gross profit ratio averaging around 12.4%, peaking near 14.7%.103 The profit-to-cost ratio was lower, around 5.02% in October 2015.103 It's important to note that high retailer margins (e.g., a 60% margin achieved by a US retailer sourcing plush toys 104) do not reflect the manufacturer's profitability.
Plastics: Profitability varies between basic materials and finished parts. For Basic Plastics and Synthetic Resin Manufacturing, profit was estimated at 5.7% of revenue in 2024, but margins are shrinking due to rising raw material costs.105 For Plastic Parts Manufacturing, margins are reported as relatively stable, as manufacturers pass on cost increases through higher prices or shift to higher-value products, though a specific percentage is not provided.106
C. Key Factors Influencing Chinese Exporter Profitability
Multiple interconnected factors shape the profitability landscape for Chinese exporters:
Cost Structure: While labor costs in China remain lower than in the US or Europe, they have been rising, eroding some historical advantages.68 Volatility in raw material prices (e.g., timber for furniture, petrochemicals for plastics) significantly impacts margins in relevant sectors.99 Energy and logistics costs also play a role.107
Competition: Intense competition, both domestically among Chinese manufacturers and internationally, exerts significant downward pressure on prices and margins, especially in commoditized sectors like basic apparel, footwear, and electronic components.70
Scale and Efficiency: China's vast manufacturing ecosystem, sophisticated infrastructure (ports, highways), and extensive supplier networks enable significant economies of scale and operational efficiency, which are crucial for maintaining competitiveness, particularly in low-margin industries.4 Ongoing adoption of automation and digital manufacturing technologies further enhances efficiency.95
Innovation, Branding, and Value Addition: A critical determinant of higher profitability is the ability to move beyond basic manufacturing. Firms investing in Research & Development (R&D), developing proprietary technologies, building recognizable brands (OBM - Original Brand Manufacturing), and contributing to design (ODM - Original Design Manufacturing) can command higher prices and achieve better margins.64 Exporting more sophisticated, higher value-added products generally allows for greater pricing power.3 Conversely, a lack of strong brand identity often limits manufacturers to lower margins.112
Policy and Operating Environment: Government policies, including subsidies, tax incentives (like VAT rebates), investment in infrastructure, and preferential treatment for certain types of trade (e.g., processing trade in specific zones), have historically supported the export sector.62 However, the regulatory environment, while sometimes perceived as less stringent than in Western countries 109, can also introduce unpredictability.107 Trade policies, especially tariffs imposed by importing countries, directly impact costs and profitability (discussed further in Section III.C).
Processing Trade Model: The prevalence of processing trade, where imported components are assembled into finished goods for export, often results in a lower Domestic Value Added (DVA) captured within China.66 While facilitating large export volumes, this model typically yields lower margins for the assembling entity compared to models where more of the value chain (e.g., component production, design) is handled domestically.66
D. Considerations on Profitability Data
The analysis reveals a complex picture of Chinese manufacturer profitability. While China dominates global manufacturing and export volumes in numerous sectors, this scale does not automatically translate into high profit margins for the producers themselves. The average manufacturer, especially those operating as OEMs in commoditized sectors like basic apparel or electronic components, typically earns relatively low net margins, often in the single digits.70 Case studies like Foxconn vividly illustrate this low-margin, high-volume reality.81 This suggests a paradox where immense production capacity coexists with constrained profitability at the manufacturing stage.
However, this is not a universal rule. Significant value capture, and thus higher potential profitability, occurs elsewhere – either further up the value chain (in R&D, design, critical component manufacturing) or further down (in branding, marketing, distribution, retail). Chinese companies that successfully navigate this, like established brands Midea and Haier, or specialized high-value manufacturers such as Shenzhou International, demonstrate that higher margins are achievable.88 Their success underscores that strategic positioning, innovation, and brand building are key levers for escaping the low-margin trap often associated with being solely the "world's factory."
Furthermore, profitability trends diverge significantly across sectors. While electronics components, basic apparel, and furniture currently face notable margin pressures due to costs and competition 79, sectors like branded appliances/electrical machinery show more resilience, potentially driven by brand strength and technological content.77 This divergence highlights the necessity of analyzing profitability at a granular level, considering the specific product characteristics, market dynamics, and the manufacturer's position within the value chain, rather than relying on broad generalizations about Chinese manufacturing.
Table 2: Estimated Average Profit Margins for Chinese Manufacturers by Key Export Sector (Approx. Recent Years)
*Note: Margin ranges are estimates based on available data points and industry commentary. "Low" generally implies <5%, "Medium" 5-8%, "High" >8% net margin, relative to typical Chinese manufacturing norms. Actual margins vary significantly by firm.
III. Value Chain Dynamics and Profit Distribution
Understanding the flow of goods from China to the US requires examining not just production costs and manufacturer margins, but also how value and profit accumulate at subsequent stages of the supply chain, particularly involving US-based or Western entities.
A. Mapping Value Capture: Chinese Manufacturer vs. US Brand/Importer/Retailer Markups
A consistent finding is the stark contrast between the relatively low profit margins realized by Chinese manufacturers and the significantly higher markups applied further down the supply chain, primarily by importers, distributors, brand owners, and retailers in the US market. While manufacturers might operate on net margins of 2-7% 70, subsequent players add substantial layers of cost and profit.
Importers and wholesalers typically add margins ranging from 10% to 30% to cover their costs (logistics, customs, warehousing, sales) and generate profit.117 However, the most significant markups often occur at the brand and retail levels.120 Retailers commonly apply markups ranging from 20% to 60%, and in some sectors like fashion or luxury goods, markups of 100% (keystone pricing) or even significantly higher (120%-160% or more) over their cost are prevalent.117
This multi-layered markup structure means that the final consumer price bears little resemblance to the initial factory gate price. For example, a hypothetical product costing a manufacturer $10 to produce might be sold to a distributor for $12 (manufacturer profit included), who sells it to a retailer for $15 (distributor markup added), who then sells it to the consumer for $30 or more (retailer markup added). This illustrative 3x markup from factory cost to retail is conservative for many consumer goods categories. Specific examples cited include fashion items with 120-160% markups 121 and grocery items where cumulative markups through import, distribution, wholesale, and retail can easily double or triple the initial cost.118
Crucially, major US and Western brands (like Apple, Nike, L'Oréal, luxury houses) capture a disproportionate share of the value through intangible assets – branding, design, marketing, intellectual property (IP), and control over distribution channels – even when the physical manufacturing is outsourced to low-margin partners like Foxconn.109 The premium price paid by consumers is often attributed more to the brand's perceived value and marketing efforts than to the physical cost of production.
B. The Role of Processing Trade, FDI, and Value-Added Contribution
The structure of China's export economy, particularly the historical significance of processing trade and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), further illuminates value distribution. Processing trade involves importing components and materials, assembling them in China, and then exporting the finished products.66 This model, often facilitated by FIEs, has been instrumental in China's export growth, especially in electronics. However, it typically results in a relatively low Domestic Value Added (DVA) being captured within China, as the value of sophisticated imported components (e.g., semiconductors, advanced displays) and the profits associated with the final brand belong to foreign entities.66 Early analyses of products like the Apple iPhone assembled in China showed that only a small fraction (e.g., 3-4%) of the final product's value was attributable to activities performed in China, primarily unskilled labor costs.76
FDI has played a massive role, with FIEs accounting for over half of China's exports in the past, and an even larger share (over 70-85%) of high-tech exports.73 The presence of FIEs, particularly WFOEs from developed countries, is linked to higher export sophistication, suggesting they drive the integration of Chinese manufacturing into global value chains.73 While this brings technology and capital, it also means a significant portion of the value generated may accrue to the foreign parent companies.
This dynamic aligns with the "Smile Curve" concept in global value chains.134 This model posits that the highest value-added activities – and often the highest profitability – occur at the beginning (R&D, design, branding) and the end (marketing, sales, after-sales service) of the chain. The middle stages, typically manufacturing and assembly, tend to capture less value.134 Historically, China has excelled in these midstream activities. Its ongoing economic strategy involves moving "up the value chain" – investing in R&D, fostering domestic innovation, and building Chinese brands – precisely to capture a larger share of the value currently concentrated in the upstream and downstream segments often dominated by US and other Western firms.64
C. Impact of Recent Tariffs on Cost Structures and Profit Allocation
Recent escalations in US tariffs on Chinese goods have significantly impacted cost structures and profit allocation within the supply chain. Overwhelming evidence indicates that these tariffs are predominantly paid by US importers, leading to increased costs for US businesses and ultimately, US consumers, rather than being absorbed by Chinese exporters.1 While some negotiation might lead to minor price reductions from Chinese suppliers, their typically low margins provide little capacity to absorb substantial tariff costs.139
The scale of these tariffs has been considerable. The Section 301 tariffs initiated in 2018 imposed duties ranging from 7.5% to 25% on approximately $370 billion worth of imports from China.2 Subsequent actions and potential future policies have threatened or implemented even higher rates, including broad-based tariffs and specific hikes on strategic goods like EVs, batteries, and semiconductors, potentially reaching levels of 100% or more in some cases.1 Recent 2025 tariff announcements include baseline increases (e.g., 125% mentioned in some reports 30) and the elimination of de minimis exemptions for certain goods.14 For sectors like apparel, the cumulative effect of base duties and additional tariffs can result in effective rates exceeding 60-80%.140
These tariffs directly increase the landed cost for US importers.137 This forces importers and retailers to either absorb the cost, thereby reducing their own profit margins, or pass the increase on to consumers through higher prices. Given the scale of the tariffs, significant pass-through to consumer prices is often the result.139 This effectively shifts a larger portion of the final price towards covering import duties, altering the distribution of value away from pure product cost or profit margins (both manufacturer and retailer) and towards government revenue (via tariffs).
Beyond the direct cost of duties, tariffs impose significant indirect costs, including the expense and complexity of shifting supply chains, increased administrative burden, higher inventory holding costs due to uncertainty, and the need for potentially bifurcated sourcing strategies.138 While tariffs have incentivized some diversification away from China towards countries like Vietnam and Mexico 6, analysis suggests that China often remains integrated further upstream in these alternative supply chains.6 This implies that tariffs may shift the location of final assembly but might not fundamentally alter the underlying profit distribution across all stages of production, potentially just adding cost and complexity.
D. Comparative Analysis: Chinese Manufacturer Margins vs. US Retailer Margins
A direct comparison starkly illustrates where profits accumulate. As established, Chinese manufacturers typically operate on net profit margins in the low single digits, often 2-7% depending on the sector and firm.70 In contrast, US retailers, while also facing competitive pressures, operate with significantly higher gross profit margins (Revenue minus Cost of Goods Sold).
Overall Retail: Average US retail gross margins are substantial (e.g., 36.6% across all industries 144), while average net margins are lower but still generally higher than typical Chinese manufacturer net margins (e.g., 8.5% average net across industries 144, 3.3% net for retail sector in 2022 145, with 5-10% considered typical 146).
Electronics Retail: US electronics retailers show average net margins around 4-5%.147 However, their gross margins are considerably higher (e.g., Best Buy 4.1% net but likely much higher gross 148). Online giants like Amazon historically had thin net margins (<2%) but have improved (around 3.6%).152 This compares to Chinese electronics component manufacturers at ~2.5% net.79
Apparel Retail: US apparel retailers often report net margins in the 3-10% range (e.g., TJX 8.25%, Ross 9.89%, Gap 5.82%).125 However, their gross margins are typically very high, often 30-50% or more.153 This contrasts sharply with the average Chinese apparel manufacturer's net margin of ~5.3%.95 Wholesalers and importers add another layer of margin before the retailer.155
The key distinction lies between gross and net margins. The high gross margins of US retailers cover not only their own net profit but also substantial operating expenses associated with the US market, such as rent for prime retail locations, domestic labor costs, marketing and advertising campaigns, inventory management, logistics within the US, and administrative overhead. The Chinese manufacturer's net margin represents their profit after covering their production-related costs in China. The difference between the manufacturer's selling price and the retailer's selling price encompasses all these intermediate costs and profits.
E. Considerations on Value Distribution
The analysis strongly suggests that the primary points of value and profit capture in the China-US supply chain for most consumer goods lie significantly downstream from the Chinese factory floor. While Chinese manufacturers provide essential production capacity and often achieve remarkable efficiency at scale, their position, particularly as OEMs, often limits their pricing power and profit potential. The entities controlling the brand, the intellectual property, the marketing narrative, and access to the end consumer – predominantly US or other Western firms – command the largest share of the value chain's overall profit pool. This structure creates "choke points" where value accumulates, often far removed from the physical point of manufacture.
Furthermore, the structure of retail markups acts as an amplifier for costs introduced earlier in the chain, such as tariffs. Because retailers often calculate their selling price by applying a percentage markup to their landed cost (which includes tariffs), an increase in tariffs leads to a proportionally larger increase in the final consumer price.158 A $1 tariff might translate to a $1.50 or $2.00 increase on the shelf. This mechanism means that trade policy impacts are magnified by downstream pricing strategies, complicating assessments of the direct economic burden of tariffs and highlighting the influence of retail dynamics on the final cost borne by consumers.
Table 3: Illustrative Profit Margin Comparison: China Manufacturer vs. US Retailer (Select Categories)
* Manufacturer Net Margin estimates based on data/analysis in Section II.B.
** Retailer Gross & Net Margin estimates based on data/analysis in Section III.D, representing typical ranges. Actual margins vary widely.
IV. Deconstructing High Profit Margin Claims (The "20 Times" Context)
A. Investigating the Origin and Validity of Extreme Markup Claims
The query specifically asked to investigate claims of exceptionally high profit margins, citing "20 times" as an example. Such claims frequently surface in media reports, social media discussions, and anecdotal accounts, often focusing on industries like fashion, luxury goods, or simple consumer items where production costs appear vastly lower than retail prices.129
It is crucial to understand that a "20 times" figure (representing a 1900% markup) does not reflect the profit margin earned by the Chinese manufacturer. As detailed in Section II, typical net margins for manufacturers are in the low single digits. Instead, these extreme figures represent the total markup applied across the entire supply chain, comparing the initial factory gate price (the manufacturer's selling price, which includes their cost of goods sold plus their own small profit margin) to the final US retail price paid by the consumer.
Examples abound:
Viral videos claim Lululemon leggings cost $5-6 to make but retail for $100 (a 15-20x markup).129
Reports suggest Hermès Birkin bags retailing for $34,000-$38,000 might cost only $1,000-$1,400 to produce (a 24x to 38x markup).130
Other luxury goods are cited with production costs potentially less than 2% of the retail price, implying markups of 50x or more.128
Simpler items can show even more extreme ratios: pimple patches with a potential $0.03 factory cost and $6.00 retail price (200x markup) 159, or reusable water balloons at $0.20 cost vs $14.99 retail (75x markup).159
While these specific examples illustrate the potential for enormous markups between the factory cost and the final retail price, they are not representative of the manufacturer's profit. The manufacturer earns a small percentage on their selling price. The vast difference between that initial price and the final retail price is accumulated through subsequent stages. The "20 times" claim, therefore, is valid only in the context of the total value chain markup for specific types of products, not as an indicator of manufacturer profitability. The narrative that Chinese manufacturers themselves are reaping these massive profits is largely a misconception or myth.127
B. Analyzing Factors Driving High Retail Markups
The substantial difference between the factory price and the final US retail price is attributable to a multitude of costs and profit margins added downstream:
Branding and Marketing: This is often the largest component, especially for fashion and luxury goods. Building brand identity, advertising, celebrity endorsements, packaging, and creating perceived exclusivity represent significant investments and justify premium pricing.128
Intellectual Property (IP) and Design: Costs associated with research, development, product design, and protecting patents and trademarks are typically borne by the brand owner (often a US or Western company) and factored into the price.
Logistics and Import Costs: Transporting goods from China to the US involves substantial costs: international freight (sea or air), insurance, port handling fees (in China and the US), inland trucking, and warehousing.68
Tariffs and Duties: Import duties, including standard rates, Section 301 tariffs, potential AD/CVD, and processing fees, add a significant layer of cost, particularly with recent increases.116 These costs are part of the landed cost upon which subsequent markups are often based.
Importer/Distributor Margins: Intermediaries who handle importing, warehousing, and distributing goods to retailers add their own markup (e.g., 10-30%) to cover their operational costs and profit.118 Using trading companies instead of direct factory sourcing can further inflate costs.164
Retail Overheads: Retailers incur significant expenses, including rent for physical stores (often in prime locations for luxury brands), e-commerce platform costs, staffing, inventory management (including costs of unsold stock/markdowns), utilities, and processing returns.120
Retailer Profit Margin: The final price includes the retailer's desired net profit margin, which varies by sector but adds another percentage layer to the accumulated costs.118
C. Case Examples Illustrating Factory Cost vs. Retail Price Differentials
Specific examples help illustrate the scale of these cumulative markups:
Apparel/Fashion: As mentioned, Lululemon leggings ($5-6 cost vs $100 retail, ~15-20x) 129 and Birkin bags ($1k-$1.4k cost vs $34k-$38k retail, ~24-38x) 130 represent high-end examples. Even basic items like machine-made t-shirts might have minimal labor/factory cost ($1) compared to a retail price of $30-$55.108
Electronics: While assembly margins are thin (e.g., Foxconn), the final product price (e.g., iPhone) reflects massive value capture by the brand (Apple) through IP, software, marketing, and component costs sourced globally.76 More basic electronics show markups too: wireless chargers ($3.40 wholesale vs $12.99 retail, ~3.8x), video doorbells ($21 wholesale vs $59.98 retail, ~2.8x), portable power banks ($4 wholesale vs $34.99 retail, ~8.7x).53
Toys: A hypothetical board game example showed a $10 production cost potentially leading to a $50-$75 retail price depending on tariff levels and markup assumptions (5x-7.5x markup).169 Plush toys sourced at $1.80 allowed a US retailer a 60% margin, suggesting a retail price around $4.50 or higher (at least 2.5x markup).104
Other Consumer Goods: Examples like pimple patches ($0.03 cost vs $6 retail, 200x), bucket hats ($1.25 cost vs $15 retail, 12x), and belt bags ($1.50 cost vs $15.99 retail, ~10.7x) demonstrate high markups on relatively simple, low-cost items.159
D. Distinguishing Typical Scenarios from Exceptional Cases
It is essential to differentiate. While markups of 10x, 20x, or significantly more do exist for certain products when comparing factory cost to final US retail price, these are often exceptions driven by factors like luxury branding, very low initial production costs (e.g., pimple patches), or specific fashion trends. These extreme examples garner attention but do not represent the typical markup structure for the vast majority of goods imported from China, such as standard electronics, household appliances, or basic apparel, where total markups might be closer to the 2x-5x range. Critically, even in these exceptional cases, the Chinese manufacturer's profit remains a small fraction of the total markup. The "20 times" narrative is about the entire value chain's price inflation over the base manufacturing cost, not about the manufacturer's share of that inflation.
E. Understanding the Markup Dynamics
The phenomenon often described as "20 times profit" is better understood as a "markup mirage." It arises from comparing the final retail price in a high-cost market (like the US) with the initial production cost in a low-cost manufacturing environment (like China) and attributing the entire difference to "profit," while ignoring the numerous intermediate costs and value-adding activities. The reality is that the low single-digit profit margins typical for Chinese manufacturers stand in stark contrast to the cumulative markups applied downstream. These downstream additions – driven by logistics, tariffs, branding, marketing, distribution, retail operations, and profits for multiple intermediaries – account for the vast majority of the price difference. The extreme markup examples highlight the structure of global value chains, where profit is often concentrated far from the point of physical production, rather than indicating excessive profit-taking by the manufacturers themselves.
Furthermore, the recent trend of Chinese factory owners or representatives using platforms like TikTok to expose these cost structures introduces a new dynamic.129 While the accuracy and context of these claims can vary, they challenge the traditional information asymmetry between producers, brands, and consumers. This newfound transparency, however partial, can influence consumer perceptions of brand value, fairness, and pricing justification. It may fuel resentment towards high retail prices and potentially impact purchasing decisions or add complexity to policy debates surrounding trade and tariffs, becoming a narrative tool in ongoing trade tensions.
V. Synthesis: Identifying High-Volume, High-Profit Opportunities for China
Synthesizing the analysis of export volumes (Section I) and manufacturer profitability (Section II) allows for identification of product categories where Chinese entities might achieve a favorable combination of high export volume to the US and relatively strong profit margins, judged against typical Chinese manufacturing norms.
A. Pinpointing Categories with High Export Volume and Relatively Stronger Chinese Profit Margins
Electronics: This sector presents a bifurcated picture.
Contract Manufacturing/Components: Represents enormous export volume and value. However, profitability for the Chinese assembler/component maker is typically low (e.g., 2-5% net), as exemplified by Foxconn.78
Branded Consumer Electronics/Appliances: Still involves high volume, though perhaps less than pure components/assembly. Chinese brands like Midea and Haier demonstrate the potential for significantly better net margins (e.g., 6-9%) by controlling the brand, technology, and distribution.88 Moving up the value chain towards more sophisticated or innovative products within electronics may also offer higher margin potential than basic components.63
Potential Area: High Volume / Medium Margin (for Chinese branded goods).
Machinery: Also a top category by volume and value.
General/OEM Machinery: Profitability data is sparse, but likely follows patterns similar to electronics contract manufacturing (lower margins).
Specialized/Branded Machinery: Companies like Midea and Haier (in their relevant segments) suggest potential for medium margins (e.g., 6-9% net). China's focus on specific advanced manufacturing areas, like Electric Vehicle (EV) components (batteries, motors, compressors), could represent a high-growth, potentially higher-margin (though still competitive) segment due to technological content and policy support.14
Potential Area: High Volume / Medium Margin (for branded appliances/equipment and potentially strategic components like EV parts).
Apparel/Textiles: High volume, significant value, but generally lower average profitability (e.g., ~5.3% net) due to intense competition and commoditization.94
Basic Apparel/OEM: High Volume / Low Margin.
High-Value/Specialized Textiles/Apparel: Manufacturers like Shenzhou International show that much higher margins (>10% net) are possible through specialization, technology (e.g., performance fabrics), and strong relationships with premium brands.60
Potential Area: Medium/High Volume / High Margin (for niche/specialized manufacturers), but Low Margin for the bulk of the sector.
Furniture: High volume (implied by container shipping), but facing declining profitability and cost pressures.99 Historical profit-to-cost ratios were modest.101
Potential Area: High Volume / Low Margin. Higher margins unlikely for typical manufacturers currently.
Toys: High volume and dominant US market share 59, but margins are under pressure from costs and regulations.102 Historical gross margins (~12%) were higher than net/profit-to-cost (~5%).103 Significant value appears captured by retailers.104
Potential Area: High Volume / Low-to-Medium Margin. Electronic/STEM toys or strong proprietary brands might achieve better margins than basic toys.
Plastics: High volume for basic resins and parts.105 Margins are modest (~5.7% for basic resins) and potentially stable but not high for parts manufacturing.105
Potential Area: High Volume / Low-to-Medium Margin. Higher-value engineered parts for specific industries (auto, electronics) may offer better potential.
B. Defining "High Profit" in the Context of Chinese Manufacturing Norms
It is crucial to contextualize what constitutes a "high" profit margin for Chinese exporters. Given the prevailing average net margins of 2-5% in many high-volume sectors, achieving consistent net margins significantly above this range – perhaps 7-10% or higher – could be considered relatively "high" or strong performance within the Chinese manufacturing context. These levels remain considerably lower than the gross margins often achieved by US retailers (30%+) or the net margins of dominant global brands in some sectors.
The pathway to achieving these relatively higher margins for Chinese firms typically involves moving beyond the limitations of basic OEM production. Key strategies include:
OBM (Original Brand Manufacturing): Developing and marketing products under the company's own brand, allowing for greater pricing power and direct customer relationships (e.g., Midea's focus on growing OBM sales).113
ODM (Original Design Manufacturing): Contributing significantly to the product design and engineering, capturing value from intellectual contributions rather than just assembly.
Technological Specialization & Innovation: Focusing on high-tech, complex components or finished goods where technological expertise creates barriers to entry and justifies higher prices.65 Continuous innovation is key to maintaining a competitive edge and pricing power.65
Moving Up the Value Chain: Integrating vertically or horizontally to capture value from activities beyond basic manufacturing, such as R&D, component production, or even downstream distribution and services.65
C. Summary Addressing the User's Core Questions
Top Volume/Value Exports: Electronics (HS 85) and Machinery (HS 84) are the clear leaders in China-to-US exports by value. Apparel (HS 61/62), Furniture (HS 94), and Toys (HS 95) are also highly significant categories in terms of both value and volume.
Typical Manufacturer Profitability: Generally low, with average net margins often cited in the 2-7% range for OEM manufacturers in major export sectors. Profitability varies by sector, firm type, and position in the value chain.
Value Chain Distribution: Value and profit are disproportionately captured downstream by US/Western brands, importers, distributors, and retailers through branding, marketing, IP, and control over customer access.
"20 Times" Margin Claim: This reflects the total markup from factory cost to final US retail price in specific, often exceptional cases (e.g., luxury goods, highly branded items, very low-cost simple products). It does not represent the profit margin earned by the Chinese manufacturer.
High Volume & Relatively High Chinese Profit Categories: Based on the analysis, the sectors offering the most promising combination of high export volume to the US and the potential for relatively stronger Chinese manufacturer profit margins (i.e., medium-to-high margins relative to Chinese norms) appear to be:
Branded Consumer Electronics & Appliances (leveraging OBM strategy).
Specialized Machinery & Components (including areas like EV parts where China is developing technological strengths).
Niche/High-Value Textiles & Apparel (requiring significant specialization and/or brand partnerships). Commoditized goods like basic apparel, standard furniture, basic toys, and generic electronic components, while high volume, generally offer lower profit potential for the manufacturer.
D. Strategic Considerations for Profitability
The analysis underscores a fundamental strategic reality for Chinese exporters targeting the US market: achieving both high export volume and significantly improved profitability requires a deliberate move beyond traditional low-cost manufacturing roles. While leveraging China's scale and efficiency remains important, simply producing large volumes of goods designed and branded by others perpetuates a low-margin position. The path toward capturing a greater share of the value chain involves substantial investment and strategic focus on building indigenous capabilities in areas currently dominated by downstream players. This includes developing strong global brands (OBM), driving innovation through R&D to create unique or technologically superior products (ODM/IP creation), and potentially integrating further into distribution or service networks. This aligns with China's broader national goals of industrial upgrading and shifting from "Made in China" to "Created in China".64 Firms that successfully execute this transition are best positioned to achieve relatively higher profitability alongside continued high export volumes.
Table 4: Synthesis - China-to-US Export Categories: Volume vs. Estimated Chinese Manufacturer Profit Margin
*Margin Ranges: Low (<5% net), Medium (5-8% net), High (>8% net) are relative estimates based on typical Chinese manufacturing performance.
VI. Conclusion and Strategic Implications
A. Recap of Major Findings
This analysis of China-US export dynamics over the last 5-15 years reveals several key points:
Dominant Categories: Electrical machinery/equipment (HS 85) and machinery/computers (HS 84) consistently represent the largest export categories by value from China to the US, underpinning the trade relationship despite recent shifts. Apparel, furniture, and toys remain significant but secondary in value terms.
Manufacturer Profitability: Chinese manufacturers, especially OEMs, generally operate on low net profit margins (often 2-7%). Profitability varies significantly by sector and firm strategy, with branded companies and specialized producers achieving relatively higher margins.
Value Chain Distribution: A substantial portion of the value and profit is captured downstream by US brands, importers, distributors, and retailers through markups covering branding, marketing, logistics, and operational costs.
Extreme Markup Context: Claims of "20 times" profit margins reflect the total markup from factory cost to final US retail price in specific cases (e.g., luxury, highly branded, or very low-cost items), not the manufacturer's profit share.
High Volume/Higher Margin Potential: The most promising categories for Chinese entities seeking both high export volume and relatively stronger profit margins appear to be branded consumer electronics/appliances, specialized machinery/components (including EV-related), and niche/high-value textiles/apparel.
B. Implications for Stakeholders
These findings carry significant implications for various actors involved in the China-US trade ecosystem:
US Importers and Brands: While reliance on China for core high-volume manufactured goods persists, the landscape is increasingly complex. Managing 0the significant costs imposed by tariffs is paramount, necessitating strategies like negotiation, cost absorption, price increases, or supply chain diversification (often adopting a "China + 1" model rather than full decoupling).6 Understanding the true cost structure and value distribution is vital for negotiation and pricing. Furthermore, growing consumer awareness of markup structures, fueled by social media exposés, may require brands to refine their value communication.131 Opportunities may arise from partnering with Chinese firms that are successfully innovating and moving up the value chain.
Chinese Exporters: The imperative is clear: move beyond low-cost, low-margin OEM production to survive and thrive. Success hinges on investing in R&D, developing proprietary technology, building recognizable global brands (OBM), and potentially contributing more to design (ODM).64 This strategic shift is necessary to capture more value, improve profitability, and mitigate risks associated with intense price competition and geopolitical volatility (including tariffs and export controls).
Investors: Evaluating opportunities requires differentiating between Chinese companies. Low-margin contract manufacturers face different risks and rewards compared to innovative, branded companies with global reach or those specializing in high-growth, high-tech sectors. Vulnerability to tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and shifts in global demand must be assessed. Understanding where value is genuinely created and captured within a specific company's supply chain is crucial for accurate valuation.
Policymakers: The analysis highlights the intricate nature of global supply chains and the often indirect consequences of trade policies. Tariffs imposed on Chinese goods primarily increase costs for US businesses and consumers.139 While intended to protect domestic industries or address trade practices, their effectiveness in achieving large-scale reshoring is limited by China's established efficiency, scale, and deep integration into global networks.6 Policy decisions should consider the entire value chain, potential inflationary impacts on consumers, and the complex interplay between tariffs, costs, prices, and profit distribution.
C. Outlook on Future Profitability Trends in China-US Trade
Looking ahead, several trends are likely to shape the profitability landscape:
Continued Margin Pressure: Expect ongoing pressure on profit margins for manufacturers engaged in producing commoditized, low-value-added goods due to persistent competition, rising input costs (labor, materials), and potential trade friction.
Innovation as a Profit Driver: The potential for margin improvement for Chinese firms lies heavily in successful innovation and branding. Companies that can differentiate through technology, design, and brand value are better positioned to command higher prices and achieve healthier margins.
Geopolitical and Policy Risks: Trade tensions, tariffs, export controls, and broader geopolitical uncertainties will remain significant risks.11 These factors will continue to influence sourcing decisions, add costs and complexity to supply chains, and potentially reshape profit distribution unpredictably.
Rise of DTC and E-commerce: The increasing ability of manufacturers (including those in China) to reach global consumers directly through e-commerce platforms (e.g., Shein, Temu, TikTok shops) could disrupt traditional retail models and associated markups.129 While facing logistical and regulatory hurdles, this trend has the potential to alter value chain dynamics and allow manufacturers to capture a larger share of the final price, though likely still facing significant marketing and fulfillment costs.
In conclusion, while China remains a critical node in global supply chains serving the US market, particularly for high-volume manufactured goods, the narrative of easy, high-profit margins for Chinese exporters is largely inaccurate. Profitability is generally constrained at the manufacturing level, with significant value captured downstream. Achieving higher profitability requires Chinese firms to strategically evolve beyond basic production towards innovation and branding, a transition influenced by intense competition, rising costs, and a volatile geopolitical and trade policy environment.
Works cited
The Contentious U.S.-China Trade Relationship | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/contentious-us-china-trade-relationship
fourth-largest - U.S.-China Trade Relations - Congress.gov, accessed May 1, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11284/20
China's Export Boom - International Monetary Fund (IMF), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/09/pdf/amiti.pdf
China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries | ITIF, accessed May 1, 2025, https://itif.org/publications/2024/09/16/china-is-rapidly-becoming-a-leading-innovator-in-advanced-industries/
The US-China Trade War and Global Value Chains, accessed May 1, 2025, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/3e5537ac17a795823a3e3c46b12c0351-0050022023/related/54-The-US-China-Trade-War-and-Global-Value-Chains.pdf
documents1.worldbank.org, accessed May 1, 2025, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099812010312311610/pdf/IDU0938e50fe0608704ef70b7d005cda58b5af0d.pdf
The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29315/w29315.pdf
US-China Supply Chains Under Stress: Trade Policy Uncertainty and Production Reallocation | Sipotra, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.sipotra.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/U.S.-China-Supply-Chains-Under-Stress-Trade-Policy-Uncertainty-and-Production-Reallocation.pdf
Navigating supply chain challenges as the U.S. and China reshape trade ties, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/data-stories/changing-shape-of-supply-chain-risk.html
Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation” * - Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/9747/JH_Paper_Alfaro.pdf
Analyzing the Impact of the U.S.-China Trade War on China's Energy Transition - CSIS, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/analyzing-impact-us-china-trade-war-chinas-energy-transition
Exploring US Tariffs - ITC Trade Briefs, accessed May 1, 2025, https://tradebriefs.intracen.org/2025/2/series
Guest Contribution: “China's Electronics Exports, Tariffs, and ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://econbrowser.com/archives/2025/04/guest-contribution-chinas-electronics-exports-tariffs-and-relocating-production-to-the-u-s
U.S.-China Trade Relations - CRS Reports, accessed May 1, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11284/23
The People's Republic of China | United States Trade Representative, accessed May 1, 2025, https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china
U.S.-China Trade Relations - Congress.gov, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11284
U.S. Trade with China - Bureau of Industry and Security, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/country-papers/2971-2021-statistical-analysis-of-u-s-trade-with-china/file
Is the US-China trade war spoiling international trade statistics? | Global Policy Journal, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/29/01/2024/us-china-trade-war-spoiling-international-trade-statistics
Imports, Exports and Mirror Data with UN COMTRADE - World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS), accessed May 1, 2025, https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/content/data_retrieval/T/Intro/B2.Imports_Exports_and_Mirror.htm
Foreign Trade - U.S. Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html
Import Statistics from the US Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/econ/overview/mt0100.html
U.S. Trade with China - Bureau of Industry and Security, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/country-papers/2575-2019-statistical-analysis-of-u-s-trade-with-china/file
International Trade Data Main Page - U.S. Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/data/
US Trade in Goods by Country - U.S. Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/
Five charts that explain the US-China trade relationship | Economy and Business, accessed May 1, 2025, https://english.elpais.com/economy-and-business/2025-04-11/five-charts-that-explain-the-us-china-trade-relationship.html
Top Trading Partners - February 2025 Trade in goods on a Census Basis, in billions of dollars, unrevised. For a full list of all trading partners and their rankings, see supplemental exhibit 4 in the FT-900. Total Trade | Exports | Imports | Surpluses - U.S. Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/topcm.html
Top Trading Partners – Year-to-Date Total Trade, Exports, and Imports (Canada ranks 2, 1, and 2) - U.S. Census Bureau, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/topyr.html
International Trade in Goods and Services | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-investment/international-trade-goods-and-services
US Imports from China, by Category - Apollo Academy, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.apolloacademy.com/us-imports-from-china-by-category/
Trump Raises Tariffs on China to 145% - Overview and Trade Implications, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/trump-raises-tariffs-on-china-to-125-overview-and-trade-implications/
Trade statistics | ITC - International Trade Centre, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.intracen.org/resources/data-and-analysis/trade-statistics
DataWeb: U.S. Trade & Tariff Data, accessed May 1, 2025, https://dataweb.usitc.gov/
Open Data | United States International Trade Commission - USITC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.usitc.gov/data/index.htm
Imports 2001-2024 - International trade in goods statistics by country - ITC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.trademap.org/tradestatistics/
United States Imports, Tariffs by country 2022 | WITS Data, accessed May 1, 2025, https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Year/LTST/TradeFlow/Import/Partner/by-country
TradeMap, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.trademap.org/
Trade Map User Guide, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.trademap.org/Docs/TradeMap-Userguide-EN.pdf
Visualizing China's Dependence on U.S. Trade, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-chinas-dependence-on-u-s-trade/
China Exports to United States - 2025 Data 2026 Forecast 1992-2023 Historical, accessed May 1, 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/china/exports/united-states
U.S. Trade with China 2022 - Bureau of Industry and Security, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/country-papers/3268-2022-statistical-analysis-of-u-s-trade-with-china/file
UN Comtrade Analytics - Trade dashboard, accessed May 1, 2025, https://comtrade.un.org/labs/data-explorer/
China Trade Summary | WITS Data - World Bank, accessed May 1, 2025, https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/CHN/Year/LTST/Summary
China-US trade: analyzing UN Comtrade data - YouTube, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYu7_tsqxP8
UN Comtrade Database - the United Nations, accessed May 1, 2025, https://comtrade.un.org/
UN Comtrade Database - ChinaPower Project, accessed May 1, 2025, https://chinapower.csis.org/data/un-comtrade-database/
US Exports to China 2025, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.uschina.org/articles/us-exports-to-china-2025/
U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, December and Annual 2024, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/us-international-trade-goods-and-services-december-and-annual-2024
Countries & Regions | United States Trade Representative, accessed May 1, 2025, https://ustr.gov/countries-regions
What are the top US exports to China? - USAFacts, accessed May 1, 2025, https://usafacts.org/articles/what-are-the-top-us-exports-to-china/
US-China Trade War, Volume 2 - Rhodium Group, accessed May 1, 2025, https://rhg.com/research/us-china-trade-war-volume-2/
China (CHN) and United States (USA) Trade | The Observatory of Economic Complexity, accessed May 1, 2025, https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/usa
Trump Tariffs: What products do China and the US buy from each other? - Al Jazeera, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/4/18/trump-tariffs-what-products-do-china-and-the-us-buy-from-each-other
Importing & Exporting from China: Top 5 Products 2025 - Forceget Supply Chain Logistics, accessed May 1, 2025, https://forceget.com/blog/importing-amp-exporting-from-china-top-5-products-2025/
Top 30 Most Profitable Items to Import from China in 2025 - AMZScout, accessed May 1, 2025, https://amzscout.net/blog/products-to-import-from-china/
28 Types of Hot Selling Products to Import From China - Supplyia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.supplyia.com/hot-selling-products/
17 Most Profitable Products to Import from China to Earn First Pot of Gold - JingSourcing, accessed May 1, 2025, https://jingsourcing.com/b-china-profitable-product/
TOP 20 Cheap and Profitable Made in China Products List - Ejet Sourcing, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ejet.com/made-in-china-products-list/
What does the US import from China? - Supply Chain Dive, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/what-does-us-import-from-china/746291/
Costlier toys: US retailers, families to bear the brunt of tariffs, says ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202504/1331695.shtml
China and the Future of Global Supply Chains - Rhodium Group, accessed May 1, 2025, https://rhg.com/research/china-and-the-future-of-global-supply-chains/
Shifts in China's Industrial Supply Chain and the US-China Trade War - China Briefing, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/shifts-chinas-industrial-supply-chain-trade-war/
FRB: The Growth of Chinese Exports: An Examination of the Detailed Trade Data, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2011/1033/ifdp1033.htm
Product Sophistication and the Slowdown in Chinese Export Growth - Bank of Canada, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sdp2017-15.pdf
Chapter 1 – U.S.-China Economics and Trade Relations (Year in Review), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_1--U.S.-China_Economics_and_Trade_Relations_Year_in_Review.pdf
A Catalyst for China's High-Tech Export Competitiveness: Perspective of Technological Innovation - MDPI, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2169
(PDF) China's Exports: What Products Are Sophisticated? - ResearchGate, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228420487_China's_Exports_What_Products_Are_Sophisticated
China's Electronic Manufacturing: 2024 Performance Review and 2025 Outlook, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-electronic-manufacturing-2024-performance-2025-outlook/
Importing Furniture from China:An Ultra-Detailed Guide 2025, accessed May 1, 2025, https://chinapurchasingagent.com/importing-furniture-from-china/
China Furniture Imports Explained: Shipping and Customs Duty ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.homebridgechina.com/journal-posts/china-furniture-imports-explained-shipping-and-customs-duty-costs-details
China export manufacturing: who makes money? - QualityInspection ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://qualityinspection.org/china-export-money/
China Manufacturing: Profit Ratio from Sales Revenue: Year to Date ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/manufacturing/cn-manufacturing-profit-ratio-from-sales-revenue-ytd
Profitability and productivity of Chinese industrial firms Measurement and ownership implications | Monmouth University, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.monmouth.edu/directory/documents/2018/09/profitability-and-productivity-of-chinese-industrial-firms-measurement-and-ownership-implications.pdf/
Foreign direct investment, processing trade, and the sophistication of China's exports, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ceibs.edu/facultyCV/xubin/files/xu-lu.pdf
Procedures of the US, EU and the Position of China under the Anti-dumping Investigations, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/improving-procedural-justice-in-antidumping-investigations/procedures-of-the-us-eu-and-the-position-of-china-under-the-antidumping-investigations/7982E408E8B5511CB1FB3E6FFDB9F9F7
Exporting from China: The Determinants of Trade Status - National Bureau of Economic Research, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28289/w28289.pdf
TRACING THE VALUE-ADDED IN GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS: PRODUCT-LEVEL CASE STUDIES IN CHINA - UNCTAD, accessed May 1, 2025, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctncd2015d1_en.pdf
China Total Industrial Profits - Trading Economics, accessed May 1, 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/china/corporate-profits
Trump tariffs impact: Chinese companies panic, offer discounts for ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/trump-tariffs-impact-chinese-companies-panic-offer-discounts-for-electronics-parts-to-indian-companies/articleshow/120147335.cms
Electronic Component Manufacturing in China - Market Research ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/electronic-component-manufacturing/656/
China-Electronics Profits vs. Global Electronics Cycle | China Industry | Collection | MacroMicro, accessed May 1, 2025, https://en.macromicro.me/collections/25/cn-industry-relative/100979/china-communication-computers-electronic-equipment-industry-profits
Gross Profit Margin For Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd (2317) - Finbox, accessed May 1, 2025, https://finbox.com/TSEC:2317/explorer/gp_margin
Operating Margin - Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd (TWSE:2317) - Alpha Spread, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/twse/2317/profitability/ratio/operating-margin
Operating Margin for Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry) (2317.TW), accessed May 1, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/foxconn/operating-margin/
Hon Hai Precision Industry (HNHPF) Stock Price & Overview, accessed May 1, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/otc/HNHPF/
Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) Announces FY2024 & 4Q24 Financial Results, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.foxconn.com/en-us/press-center/press-releases/latest-news/1554
Midea Group Co., Ltd. (000333.SZ) Gross Profit Margin - StockViz.com, accessed May 1, 2025, https://stockviz.com/en/000333.SZ/gross-profit-margin
Braving the Waves - Midea Group, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.midea-group.com/content/dam/mideaco-aem/investors/financial-reports/2023-annual-report/MideaGroup-Annual-Report-2023-April-2024-pdf.pdf
Midea Achieved Record High Revenue in 2023 - EqualOcean, accessed May 1, 2025, https://equalocean.com/news/2024032820694
[Financial Report In-depth Analysis] Haier Smarthome, daily marketing expenses exceed one hundred million yuan? - Moomoo, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/43681201/financial-report-in-depth-analysis-haier-smarthome-daily-marketing-expenses
Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd. 2023 Annual Report, accessed May 1, 2025, http://www.sse.com.cn/disclosure/listedinfo/announcement/c/new/2024-04-04/600690_20240404_LNXH.pdf
Annual Report 2023 - Haier, accessed May 1, 2025, https://smart-home.haier.com/en/gpxx/iv/P020240430516036471343.pdf
2021 - annual report - Haier, accessed May 1, 2025, https://smart-home.haier.com/en/gpxx/iv/P020220428801089071891.pdf
Major Household Appliance Manufacturing in the US - Market Research Report (2015-2030), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/major-household-appliance-manufacturing/789/
Soft gripper for textile industry - Soft Robotics Gripper, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.softroboticgripper.com/company-news/the-clothing-manufacturer-s-profit-margins-are-comparable-to-tencent-s
Apparel Manufacturing in China - Market Research Report (2015 ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/apparel-manufacturing/197/
Industrial Profits of China's Textile Industry Above Designated Size ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.texleader.com.cn/en/news-34878.html
Footwear Manufacturing in China - Market Research Report (2015 ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/footwear-manufacturing/203/
China Garment & Apparel: Profit to Cost Ratio | Economic Indicators ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/garment-and-apparel/cn-garment--apparel-profit-to-cost-ratio
The Conflict between Technology and Scale: Evidence from China's ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/230
China Furniture Market Size, Share, Trends, Scope & Forecast, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/china-furniture-market/
China Furniture: Profit to Cost Ratio | Economic Indicators | CEIC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/furniture-manufacturing/cn-furniture-profit-to-cost-ratio
Toy Manufacturing in China - Market Research Report (2015-2030), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/toy-manufacturing/269/
China Toy: Gross Profit Ratio | Economic Indicators | CEIC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/cultural-educational-art-craft-sport-and-recreational-product-toy/cn-toy-gross-profit-ratio
China Toys Wholesale Market 2025: Guide to Sourcing Strategies, accessed May 1, 2025, https://tonysourcing.com/china-toys-wholesale-market-2025/
Basic Plastics and Synthetic Resin Manufacturing in China - Market ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/basic-plastics-and-synthetic-resin-manufacturing/303/
Plastic Parts Manufacturing in China - Market Research Report ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/china/industry/plastic-parts-manufacturing/358/
China vs. US: Supply Chain Proximity and Logistics Advantages - Diversitech Global, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.diversitech-global.com/post/china-vs-us-supply-chain-proximity-and-logistics-advantages
According to CNBC, U.S. apparel import tariffs from China will now be 65%, Vietnam will be 50%, and Bangladesh will be 37%. : r/malefashionadvice - Reddit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/malefashionadvice/comments/1jqt32o/according_to_cnbc_us_apparel_import_tariffs_from/
Why China Is "The World's Factory" - Investopedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/102214/why-china-worlds-factory.asp
Top Chinese Cities Exporting To The U.S. |Texas INTL Freight, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.txintlfreight.com/top-chinese-cities-exporting-to-the-us/
Full article: Exports and New Products in China – A Generalised Propensity Score Approach with Firm-to-Firm Spillovers, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220388.2021.1956470
Analysis on China's Export Brand Strategy - E3S Web of Conferences, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/11/e3sconf_netid2021_02060.pdf
Midea Bets on Innovation, Global Expansion as Trade Headwinds Rise, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.caixinglobal.com/2025-04-21/chinese-appliance-giant-tops-56-billion-annual-revenue-as-it-leans-into-obm-strategy-b2b-growth-and-ai-powered-transformation-amid-rising-geopolitical-risks-102311502.html
Trade Balances in China and the US Are Largely Driven by Domestic Macro Forces, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2024/09/12/trade-balances-in-china-and-the-us-are-largely-driven-by-domestic-macro-forces
The Pros and Cons of Manufacturing in China 2023 - Cad Crowd, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.cadcrowd.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-manufacturing-in-china/
China - Import Tariffs - International Trade Administration, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/china-import-tariffs
Distributor margin by industry & retail markup calculation - Exporteers, accessed May 1, 2025, https://exporteers.com/what-is-a-reasonable-margin-for-your-distributor/
What are the typical markups (%) on grocery food products by the different levels of distribution in the US including importer, distributor, broker, wholesaler, retailer? - Reddit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Entrepreneur/comments/1f439y1/what_are_the_typical_markups_on_grocery_food/
Distributor Markup and Profit Margins in the Supply Chain - PROS, accessed May 1, 2025, https://pros.com/learn/blog/distributor-pricing-profit-margins-pricing-markups
Luxury lies exposed: China outs US brands playing the 'Made in America' game - Reddit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/China/comments/1jyjqzr/luxury_lies_exposed_china_outs_us_brands_playing/
Markup vs. Margin: A Guide for Wholesale Fashion Brands - JOOR, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.joor.com/insights/markup-vs-margin-a-guide-for-wholesale-fashion-brands
Philippines - Pricing - export.gov, accessed May 1, 2025, https://legacy.export.gov/article?id=Philippines-Pricing
Tariffs and retail prices: What consumers need to know - FreightWaves, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/tariffs-and-retail-prices-what-consumers-need-to-know
The Profit Recipe: How Markup and Margin Shape Your Food Business, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.timforrest.com/the-profit-recipe-how-markup-and-margin-shape-your-food-business/
What's a good markup for fashion products when importing and creating a brand? - Reddit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ecommerce/comments/18s8gl2/whats_a_good_markup_for_fashion_products_when/
Retailer markup and exchange rate pass-through: Evidence from the Mexican CPI micro data - Bank for International Settlements, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bis.org/publ/work884.pdf
Notes on Ethos Debate Interview on Stoa Trade Topic - Economic Thinking, accessed May 1, 2025, https://economicthinking.org/notes-on-ethos-debate-interview-on-stoa/
List of Big Brands Made in China – And Why the Cost Is Less Than 2% of What You Pay, accessed May 1, 2025, https://internationalsupermarketnews.com/archives/19339
Birkin, Lululemon, and TikTok: How China is using the tariff war for luxury goods to go direct from factory to your feed - The Economic Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/birkin-lululemon-and-tiktok-how-china-is-using-the-tariff-war-for-luxury-goods-to-go-direct-from-factory-to-your-feed/articleshow/120320075.cms
What a $34,000 bag really costs: Chinese suppliers show luxury goods at 90% lower prices amid trade war with US - The Economic Times, accessed May 1, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/what-a-34000-bag-really-costs-chinese-suppliers-show-luxury-goods-at-90-lower-prices-amid-trade-war-with-us/articleshow/120307605.cms
“We've been scammed!”: Chinese factory whistleblowers expose luxury brand markups, accessed May 1, 2025, https://dmnews.com/dna-tns-weve-been-scammed-chinese-factory-whistleblowers-expose-luxury-brand-markups/
What is the logic behind Chinese manufacturers revealing their European luxury clients? : r/Sino - Reddit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Sino/comments/1jzq9uk/what_is_the_logic_behind_chinese_manufacturers/
China Exposes Crazy Markups On Luxury Goods As Tariff War Continues | NDTV Profit, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XeAEi7mkBM
projects.iq.harvard.edu, accessed May 1, 2025, https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/2020-02-cid-fellows-wp-123-global-supply-chain-revised-2.pdf
From partner to rival: The sectoral evolution of China's trade - CEPR, accessed May 1, 2025, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/partner-rival-sectoral-evolution-chinas-trade
Strategies and Tactics of Chinese Contract Manufacturers and Western OEMs (2001‐2011) - Bayes Business School, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.bayes.citystgeorges.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/366765/cass-knowledge-chinese-manufacturers-tactics-oems.pdf
How to Calculate Import Duties and Taxes From China to the US, accessed May 1, 2025, https://usacustomsclearance.com/process/import-costs-from-china/
Impacts of Section 301 Tariffs on Imports from China: Case Studies of Apparel, Footwear, Travel Goods and Furniture - trade partnership worldwide, llc, accessed May 1, 2025, https://tradepartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/China-301-Tariff-Costs-Joint-Association-Study-FINAL.pdf
The Costs of Tariffs in the U.S.-China Trade War - Econofact, accessed May 1, 2025, https://econofact.org/the-costs-of-tariffs-in-the-u-s-china-trade-war
4 Strategies to Navigate China Tariffs on Apparel - MakeMine, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.makemine.com/blog/china-tariffs
The Impact of US-China Tariffs on Ecommerce and Logistics, accessed May 1, 2025, https://dclcorp.com/blog/supply-chain/impact-us-china-tariffs/
How to Calculate Landed Cost for China Imports | CFC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://cargofromchina.com/landed-cost/
Enhancing supply chain resilience in a new era of policy - Deloitte, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/managing-supply-chains-amid-tariffs.html
Industry Benchmarks of Gross, Net and Operating Profit Margins - Vena Solutions, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.venasolutions.com/blog/average-profit-margin-by-industry
US Retail Industry Sales And Profits Trends, 2001–2022: Steady Growth - Forrester, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.forrester.com/blogs/us-retail-industry-sales-and-profits-trends-2001-2022-steady-growth/
What is a good profit margin for retail? - Guide My Growth, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.guidemygrowth.com/what-is-a-good-profit-margin-for-retail/
Profit Margins of the Makers of PCs and Handheld Devices - Information Today, Inc., accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.infotoday.com/LinkUp/Profit-Margins-of-the-Makers-of-PCs-and-Handheld-Devices-107588.shtml
Consumer Electronics Stores in the US - Market Research Report (2015-2030), accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/consumer-electronics-stores/1024/
List of most profitable companies in Consumer Electronics Industry over the past 12 months, accessed May 1, 2025, https://csimarket.com/Industry/Industry_Profitability.php?ind=1012
Consumer Electronics & Appliances Rental in the US - Market Research Report (2015-2030) - IBISWorld, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/consumer-electronics-appliances-rental/1368/
Consumer Electronics Industry Profitability by quarter, Gross, Operating and Net Margin from 1 Q 2025 - CSIMarket, accessed May 1, 2025, https://csimarket.com/Industry/industry_Profitability_Ratios.php?ind=1012
What Is a Good Profit Margin for Retailers? - Investopedia, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/071615/what-profit-margin-usual-company-retail-sector.asp
List of most profitable companies in Apparel, Footwear & Accessories Industry over the past 12 months - CSIMarket, accessed May 1, 2025, https://csimarket.com/Industry/Industry_Profitability.php?ind=401
List of most profitable companies in Retail Apparel Industry over the past 12 months, accessed May 1, 2025, https://csimarket.com/Industry/Industry_Profitability.php?ind=1301
Clothing & Clothing Accessories Wholesaling in the US - Market Research Report (2015-2030) - IBISWorld, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/clothing-clothing-accessories-wholesaling/2036/
What is a good profit margin for clothing stores? - Magestore POS, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.magestore.com/blog/what-is-a-good-profit-margin-for-clothing-stores/
Mastering Profit Margins: A Comprehensive Guide for Clothing Retailers - New Frontier Funding, accessed May 1, 2025, https://newfrontierfunding.com/understanding-cost-based-pricing-apparel-business/
Apparel Import Tariff Rates around the World (updated March 2025 ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://shenglufashion.com/2025/03/07/apparel-import-tariff-rates-around-the-world-updated-march-2025/
15 Most Profitable Items to Import From China in 2025 - Fit Small Business, accessed May 1, 2025, https://fitsmallbusiness.com/profitable-items-to-import-from-china/
The prospects of Chinese firms in an opening economy: Breaking away from the “flying geese” patternor turning into another case of East Asian ersatz capitalism? - OpenEdition Journals, accessed May 1, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/12276
IS THE RENMINBI UNDERVALUED? The myths of China's trade surplus and global imbalances - European Centre for International Political Economy, accessed May 1, 2025, https://ecipe.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/is-the-renminbi-undervalued-the-myths-of-china2019s-trade-surplus-and-global-imbalances.pdf
The Tariff Risk Isn't In Inflation (Part II) - RIA - Real Investment Advice, accessed May 1, 2025, https://realinvestmentadvice.com/resources/blog/the-tariff-risk-isnt-in-inflation-part-ii/
The comprehensive list of high-profit margin products to import from China you must know!, accessed May 1, 2025, https://nexusgroupepc.com/the-comprehensive-list-of-high-profit-margin-products-to-import-from-china/
Is It Safe to Buy From China? - Kanary Solutions, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.kanarysolutions.com/resources/is-it-safe-to-buy-from-china
Working Paper 07-5: A (Lack of) Progress Report on China's Exchange Rate Policies, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp07-5.pdf
Global Commodity Chains and the New Imperialism - Monthly Review, accessed May 1, 2025, https://monthlyreview.org/2019/03/01/global-commodity-chains-and-the-new-imperialism/
What are the hidden costs of bulk purchasing from China and how to ..., accessed May 1, 2025, https://dikapabed.com/what-are-the-hidden-costs-of-bulk-purchasing-from-china-and-how-to-avoid-them/
What makes up the cost of importing from China? - ExamineChina, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.examinechina.com/the-cost-of-importing-from-china/
The Math of Tariffs - Stonemaier Games, accessed May 1, 2025, https://stonemaiergames.com/the-math-of-tariffs/
Chinese Suppliers Expose Luxury Good Markups - Perplexity, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.perplexity.ai/page/chinese-suppliers-expose-luxur-hyPIG.zWTc6PPFB9bK5m7Q
www.coface.fr, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.coface.fr/content/download/71887/file/WEB_GB_FOCUS-US%20CHINA_ELEECTRONICS%20_191124.pdf
East Asia-Pacific's Participation in the Global Value Chain ... - USITC, accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/journals/east_asia-pacifics_participation_in_the_global_value_chain_for_electronic_products.pdf
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment